
Belive it or not, The Taming of the Shrew is my favourite play by William Shakespeare. As controversial as it can be with a feminists and modernists alike, I have a different interpretation. I believe that Petruchio does come to love Katherina and, more shockingly, that she too comes to not only appreciate, but also love him.
Shakespeare's comedy is about submission: getting Kate to submit to the will of her husband; to make her heel to her husband. If we take the play purely on that level, then we lose the complexity that is provided. Such a reductionist view that ignores character development could be applied to any of his plays: Romeo and Juliet is about horny teenagers; Macbeth is about a ambitious jerk; and Hamlet is about a whiny spoiled brat.
Instead, we should see Petruchio as the man who does set out to dominate a woman who is behaving in a way that is unbecoming the time. However, he discovers a woman who is his equal and worthy of his love. Kate too discovers a man who is not merely her equal, but who also cares enough to show her the happiness that she is missing by playing the part of the shrew.
In the end, Kate and Petruchio are the happier couple; not due to submission to one another's will, but because of the realization that love is not about getting what you want, but getting what you need.

